 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
PFI 2002 Annual Conference |
|
 |
PFI 2002 Annual Conference
in conjunction with WFS (World Future Society)
"Worldview 2002: Futures Unlimited!"
July 20-22, 2002
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Social Change, Social Policing: A consideration
of Trends |
|
|
| |
|
|
Presenters:
Dr. John P. Jarvis,
Behavioral Science Unit, FBI Academy
Supervisory Special Agent Carl J. Jensen, III, MS,
Behavioral Science Unit, FBI Academy
Bernard H. Levin, Ed.D
Blue Ridge Community College,
Waynesboro, VA Police Department |
|
|
| |
|
|
There has been great sound and fury in the law enforcement world
regarding how to best serve the public. Models such as Community
Policing, Problem Oriented Policing, and Intelligence Led Policing
have developed followings, but address the present without much
thought for the future. What will it all signify as law enforcement
attempts to navigate the 21~ Century? In particular, have these
and/or other models prepared the police to address the impact of
changes in society and the expectations/needs of the citizenry in
the Information Age? Currently, there is virtually no discussion
regarding the social skills and social intelligence policing will
need in order to effectively, efficiently, and ethically serve the
communities of tomorrow. The presenters modestly propose to fill
that void (or at least raise some of the issues) by articulating
several trends believed to affect the policing world in the next
20 years. Some of these will have important implications for changes
the police will need to consider to remain viable to the communities
they serve. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Biometrics: The Crime Prevention of the future? |
|
|
| |
|
|
Presenters:
Mora Fiedler Ph.D.
Social Science Grants Administrator
Colorado Springs, CO Police Department
Anthony Ibarra,
CEO, Digatron, Inc.,
Denver, CO
Al Youngs JD
Division Chief,
Lakewood, CO Police Department |
|
|
| |
|
|
Biometrics refers to the automatic identification of a person
based on his/her physiological or behavioral characteristics. This
method of identification is preferred over traditional methods involving
passwords and PIN numbers for various reasons: (i) the person to
be identified is required to be physically present at the point-of-identification;
(ii) identification based on biometric techniques obviates the need
to remember a password or carry a token. With the increased use
of computers as vehicles of information technology, it is necessary
to restrict access to sensitive/personal data. By replacing PINs,
biometric techniques can potentially prevent unauthorized access
to or fraudulent use of AIMs, cellular phones, smart cards, desktop
PCs, workstations, and computer networks. PINs and passwords may
be forgotten, and token-based methods of identification like passports
and driver's licenses may be forged, stolen, or lost. Clearly, the
facilities that Biometrics offer will be a boon to prevention of
crime, a safeguard to security, and make accessing secure IT systems
to authorised personnel easier; but what is the future of Biometrics? |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 2001 - An Odyssey: The Erosion of Privacy |
|
|
| |
|
|
Presenters:
Jim Conser Ph.D.
Deputy Director, Ohio Peace Officer Training Commission
Tyree C. Blocker MS
Major, Pennsylvania State Police
Alan Beckley LLM.
Chief Inspector (Retired), Much Wenlock, Shropshire, England |
|
|
| |
|
|
High-level security measures introduced by States to counter
terrorist acts, such as identity cards, searches and surveillance
reduce the right to the private and family life of citizens. This
session will discuss the extension of these powers in to the future
and argue that their retention cannot be justified in the long term.
The collection of intimate samples, DNA and other personal data
is an infringement of personal liberty and data protection protocols.
The question is: can the governments in apparently free and open
democratic societies justify the level of the collection of personal
data that it currently does and will this lead to a 'big brother'
society where privacy becomes a luxury only the rich can afford? |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Global terrorism of the future: How to fight
the enemy from within |
|
|
| |
|
|
Presenters:
Bill Tafoya Ph.D.
Retired FBI,
Consultant, Computer Sciences Corporation, Falls Church, VA
Professor of Criminal Justice, University of New Haven, CT
Marvin Cetron Ph.D.
President, Forecasting International,
3612 Boat Dock Drive, Falls Church, VA
Colin Cramphorn
Deputy Chief Constable,
The police Service of Northern Ireland, Belfast, Northern Ireland
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Events of recent months underline the vulnerability to attack
of apparently secure and stable democratic States. Terrorists, according
to intelligence sources, resided and indeed, were trained within
the very countries they subsequently attacked with multi-fatal results.
This session will discuss experiences from the USA and the long
struggle within Northern Ireland to address these grave problems.
The expert speakers will inform attendees of successful counter-terrorist
techniques using intelligence, surveillance and criminal profiling
to identify and bring to justice the scourge of terrorism. The session
will also suggest future plans and strategies to restore tranquillity
and security to reduce fear in modern society, including the commitment
to guarantee the human rights of all citizens, including suspected
terrorists. |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Police Weapons of less lethal force: Are sci-fi solutions the answer? |
|
|
| |
|
|
Presenters:
Gerald Konkler JD
Captain,
Tulsa Police Department, Oklahoma
Bernard H. Levin Ed.D
Blue Ridge Community College,
Waynesboro, VA Police Department
Alan Beckley LLM.
Chief Inspector (Retired),
Much Wenlock, Shropshire, England |
|
|
| |
|
|
According to United Nations Basic Principles, Governments must
properly equip police with a broad range of weapons, including defensive
equipment and less lethal options (which must be carefully evaluated)
(Principles 2&4), also, there must be proper training, particularly
in the ethical issues and avoidance of force (19&20). The provision
of less lethal options has been discussed for many years and many
'whacky' and impractical devices have been trialled and rejected.
This session will remind us that national governments and law enforcement
agencies have a duty to provide less lethal options to police officers
for use in critical incidents to preserve the right to life; it
will present the relevant issues, and try to predict the future
in this contentious arena. |
|
|
| |
 |
 |
 |
|